Addressing CVEs in 1.13.0

The public knowledge pool and discussion forum of the OWS community. Do not post confidential information here!
javaapp
Posts: 40
Joined: 20 May 2020, 18:34

Addressing CVEs in 1.13.0

Post by javaapp »

There is concern expressed by a group that has scanned the openwebstart codebase for vulnerabilities from CVEs. From looking at their reports it seems like the vulnerabilities are primarily in the tools/plugins used as part of the maven build and not with the delivered artifacts of OWS (ie the jars that get deployed to end-user machines). Can you provide any statements regarding plans to address these CVEs and whether or not they are impactful to current end-user machines?

I'm attempting to attach the reports here

Thank you,
John
Attachments
ows_cve_report_1.png
ows_cve_report_1.png (170.29 KiB) Viewed 1321 times
ows_cve_report_2.png
ows_cve_report_2.png (278.71 KiB) Viewed 1321 times
ows_cve_report_3.png
ows_cve_report_3.png (393.91 KiB) Viewed 1321 times

Janak Mulani
Posts: 1088
Joined: 24 Mar 2020, 13:37

Re: Addressing CVEs in 1.13.0

Post by Janak Mulani »

Sure we can provide a statement.

Can you please tell me :

Which company do you belong to?
Which company/group is interested in the vulnerability report?
Which tool was used to produce the report? Is the tool available in github?
Was the tool run from within github on the codebase in github?
Was the tool run on the codebase of both icedtea-web and openwebstart in github?

Thanks

Janak Mulani
Posts: 1088
Joined: 24 Mar 2020, 13:37

Re: Addressing CVEs in 1.13.0

Post by Janak Mulani »

Hi John,

Can you please tell me which SAST tool was used So that I can also check for myself, do the fixes and verify them by running the tool again?

Thanks

TechGuy47
Posts: 2
Joined: 06 Apr 2026, 15:57

Re: Addressing CVEs in 1.13.0

Post by TechGuy47 »

@Janak - I have a similar concerns as John above. Based on my own experience, these seem to be consistent with the results I see for OpenWebStart using Snyk as the SAST. Would you be still be willing to verify and fix the findings, as offered above? Would love to have these issues resolved!

Thanks in Advance!

Janak Mulani
Posts: 1088
Joined: 24 Mar 2020, 13:37

Re: Addressing CVEs in 1.13.0

Post by Janak Mulani »

Thanks for suggesting Snyk. We will verify and fix.

TechGuy47
Posts: 2
Joined: 06 Apr 2026, 15:57

Re: Addressing CVEs in 1.13.0

Post by TechGuy47 »

@Janak - Thank you for the response above. Has there been any progress in resolving these issues? Is there an ETA for the resolutions to be deployed?

Janak Mulani
Posts: 1088
Joined: 24 Mar 2020, 13:37

Re: Addressing CVEs in 1.13.0

Post by Janak Mulani »

We will include this in the next release, scheduled for the end of May,

Janak Mulani
Posts: 1088
Joined: 24 Mar 2020, 13:37

Re: Addressing CVEs in 1.13.0

Post by Janak Mulani »

TechGuy47 wrote: 08 Apr 2026, 21:27 @Janak - I have a similar concerns as John above. Based on my own experience, these seem to be consistent with the results I see for OpenWebStart using Snyk as the SAST. Would you be still be willing to verify and fix the findings, as offered above? Would love to have these issues resolved!

Thanks in Advance!
@TechGuy47 I tried snyk and ran it on the source code for OWS and ITW. But I did not get the same report as mentioned above. Do you get the same reports as mentioned above in ows_cve_report_1.png, ows_cve_report_2.png and ows_cve_report_3.png? If yes then how did you run snyk i.e. with what commandline options? Is it necessary to have the licensed version of snyk to get a reports like the ones mentioned above?

Janak Mulani
Posts: 1088
Joined: 24 Mar 2020, 13:37

Re: Addressing CVEs in 1.13.0

Post by Janak Mulani »

I was able to run snyk test locally on OWS and ITW codebase and it has generated reports. Will try to fix the vulnerabilities.

Post Reply